saviourseph: (Quite Interesting)
[personal profile] saviourseph
[Error: unknown template qotd]
Several, but I'll go with The Shining as it's one of the few that isn't "HATEHATEHATE". While it's a terrible adaptation and about as faithful to the book as if it had been the My Little Pony Movie, I do think it manages to stand on its own merits - I love both.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-27 05:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yunghustlaz.livejournal.com
I think The Shining was a great film adaptation. I mean, it was just that, an adaptation but it really captured the spirit of the book with some token alterations.

If anything, compare it to the later TV-miniseries adaptation that played the book straight, very straight. It dragged, was kinda languid, and lacked the tension or energy of the movie. That kind of book tension that King's so good at doesn't adapt to screen so well sometimes haha. It's telling that some of his best movie adaptations are from short stories as such.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-27 05:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paulnolan.livejournal.com
Oh god, the miniseries was awful. D:

It's telling that some of his best movie adaptations are from short stories as such.

Comparing the eyegouging adaptation of the doorstop IT to, say, 1408 or Carrie (short story and novella respectively), this is very true.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-27 07:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wille-zur-musik.livejournal.com
Oh come on. Tim Curry is an amazingly hilarious eye-gouger!
...
.....
ehehe.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-27 10:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zellie-kinneas.livejournal.com
AUUUGH I saw this question and it made me foam at the mouth 'cause I instantly thought of The Count of Monte Cristo DDx

Profile

saviourseph: (Default)
saviourseph

December 2020

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930 31  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags