saviourseph: (Scary)
saviourseph ([personal profile] saviourseph) wrote2008-05-28 01:57 am

[identity profile] taure.livejournal.com 2008-05-28 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
the plans were "not about criminalising art or pornographic cartoons more generally, but about targeting obscene, and often very realistic, images of child sexual abuse which have no place in our society".

From my understanding they don't plan on stopping shota or loli, but trying to decrease or eliminate art and renders which look close to real life.

But in all honesty, this is why I stay out of this area. While I agree that shota/loli =/= CP the fact remains there may come a day you can get into trouble for having it and I certainly don't want to be in that boat if it happens.

[identity profile] paulnolan.livejournal.com 2008-05-28 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
That meant it wasn't targeting all pornographic art, just that with children; the bit about realism is between commas and is therefore just an aside. All shota and loli would be included from what I can tell.

[identity profile] taure.livejournal.com 2008-05-28 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
Probably. I suggest fans tread carefully from now on about what they post. Luckily I don't care for shota/lolicon.