saviourseph: (Scary)
saviourseph ([personal profile] saviourseph) wrote2008-05-28 01:57 am

[identity profile] omgimsuchadork.livejournal.com 2008-05-28 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, I love the association with anime there. :/

[identity profile] princess-saix.livejournal.com 2008-05-28 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
XD As a person who likes shota/loli, it sounds like they're trying to tackle photomanipulations and depictions of actual children, rather than the generic child, fictional child... Then again, who knows? DD: If they just tackle all shota, it's freaking nuts.

[identity profile] demizeku-otp.livejournal.com 2008-05-28 06:06 am (UTC)(link)
UWAAA! *clings to her XehanortxIenzo community* That's not fairrrr. Not all shota/loli is child abuse. ;_; I have a whole folder of shota so fluffy it would make people's teeth rot. Very consensual, very cutesy.

[identity profile] harpylink234.livejournal.com 2008-05-28 10:19 am (UTC)(link)
Never liked shota to begin with but..... This is where we get into murky waters. What do they deem to be a child and what isn't. Personally, 16 and over is fair game to me, but others don't think so. Reminds me of when DA slapped on the age rule. "No, you can't even say the character is 18 or whatever." XD That rule is pretty much dead, but still.